inskrish
07-22 11:39 AM
My wifes also had same problem.
I really envy at you.:)
I really envy at you.:)
wallpaper Guitar chords and harmonised
bigboy007
11-21 01:59 AM
there is no "Permanent" Job in us, I assume you are now atleast 5 years old or having masters degree... we already have these in place...
Why a asylee or gc lottery guy should be hired before a skilled person and he is not comparing apples to apples... no country limits and elimate backlog by recap anything else is waste of time ...
Why a asylee or gc lottery guy should be hired before a skilled person and he is not comparing apples to apples... no country limits and elimate backlog by recap anything else is waste of time ...
alex99
10-19 09:25 AM
Please note all pending 500,000 applications do not belong to EB. Some are family based.
Regards
Alex
Regards
Alex
2011 Guitar Chords – Economy of
authrd
02-21 10:15 AM
H1B extension receipt date: 10/11/2007
AReceived by Attorney: 1/31/2008
Not premium and with same company.
AReceived by Attorney: 1/31/2008
Not premium and with same company.
more...
snathan
06-17 03:18 PM
This is B*^#S*&^. Take this to an attorney and see if it’s legally valid. I suggest you not to sign as he puts every possible issues and make you responsible for that. I never come across any agreement like this. Normally they ask only for non-competent agreement.
Why do you care if the client does not pay your employer and why you pay for the recovery. Simply Blood suckers. Tell him that you can not sign as he did not inform you about this agreement in advance and its not fair.
Thanks
Why do you care if the client does not pay your employer and why you pay for the recovery. Simply Blood suckers. Tell him that you can not sign as he did not inform you about this agreement in advance and its not fair.
Thanks
sledge_hammer
09-10 07:11 PM
1. When you were a student did you carry your I-20 with you all the time?
2. When you were on H-1B did you carry it around?
If your answer is yes, then do carry your GC too!
Friends,
Are we required to carry GC with us all the time ? :confused:
My attorney says we must. What if I lose it or damage it ? Can we carry a photocopy ?
2. When you were on H-1B did you carry it around?
If your answer is yes, then do carry your GC too!
Friends,
Are we required to carry GC with us all the time ? :confused:
My attorney says we must. What if I lose it or damage it ? Can we carry a photocopy ?
more...
sammas
07-08 12:13 PM
No I did not. The instructions said, I don't have to send photos.
That is the reason, they asked me to appear for bio-metrics which I did.
Probably the RFE might be related to photos not being sent. A friend of mine received a RFE for not sending the photos eventhough they are not required to be sent but he did not get any Biometrics notice.
After the photos were sent, the application was approved.
That is the reason, they asked me to appear for bio-metrics which I did.
Probably the RFE might be related to photos not being sent. A friend of mine received a RFE for not sending the photos eventhough they are not required to be sent but he did not get any Biometrics notice.
After the photos were sent, the application was approved.
2010 how to play guitar chords,
StarSun
08-16 09:28 AM
Pappu,
Do I need to post my question on this thread or I can pass it on before in time to StarSun or you? B'cause posting my GC issue with personal information would not look appropriate on a public forum.
Let me know.
If there are personal details that is related to the question, please send the details to IVCOORDINATOR@GMAIL.COM Have the subject line:
IV Username, Aug 19, Conf call.
Can we post a question now or only after 8:30PM Thursday?
You have to be present to ask the question on the call, and therefore we prefer if you posted the questions on Thursday.
Do I need to post my question on this thread or I can pass it on before in time to StarSun or you? B'cause posting my GC issue with personal information would not look appropriate on a public forum.
Let me know.
If there are personal details that is related to the question, please send the details to IVCOORDINATOR@GMAIL.COM Have the subject line:
IV Username, Aug 19, Conf call.
Can we post a question now or only after 8:30PM Thursday?
You have to be present to ask the question on the call, and therefore we prefer if you posted the questions on Thursday.
more...
jthomas
11-20 05:26 PM
I don't know how to start a new thread
send your comments on
http://power.elecdesign.com/Articles/index.cfm?articleid=17564&StyleName=maroon
IEEE Agrees with SIA on H-1B Visas for Foreign Engineers, Scientists
send your comments on
http://power.elecdesign.com/Articles/index.cfm?articleid=17564&StyleName=maroon
IEEE Agrees with SIA on H-1B Visas for Foreign Engineers, Scientists
hair Guitar Chords Poster at Art.
diptam
07-23 03:58 PM
What is your idea/plan to do with this Data ? My Eb3 140 is pending since May 2007 at NSC. What are they up to - why the dates are NOT moving beyond Mar 2007 ? Who can ask this questions to NSC , we don't have the authority to do that.
I found 1 point to drive this - there are lots of peoples who got EB3 140 approved after my Receipt Date May 2007. If we can compile that data in spread sheet and share that with our Local Congressman/Senator just to show them how NSC is mis managed that might create some pressure - what do you folks say ?
Thanks!
Hi Guys,
This is a small list I have compiled. Can we all share our RECEIPT #'s, CATEGORY and PD's & COUNTRY as well, so we have another method to gauge how NSC is/not processing our files. I will update the list with your postings. Thanks!
.....
I found 1 point to drive this - there are lots of peoples who got EB3 140 approved after my Receipt Date May 2007. If we can compile that data in spread sheet and share that with our Local Congressman/Senator just to show them how NSC is mis managed that might create some pressure - what do you folks say ?
Thanks!
Hi Guys,
This is a small list I have compiled. Can we all share our RECEIPT #'s, CATEGORY and PD's & COUNTRY as well, so we have another method to gauge how NSC is/not processing our files. I will update the list with your postings. Thanks!
.....
more...
snathan
04-09 10:40 PM
Hello Everyone,
Hi I am a student in United States and I was on Optional Practical Training from Jan 2008 to Dec 2008. As I finished my OPT in Dec 2008 I joined again in New course for M.S in soft. Eng.
In the month of November I got a job in California through an employer, who is based in New Jersey. As I got a job the employer asked me to sign a contract which states that I will be paid 60,000 per year and I shouldn't work with his clients for 1 year after the agreement is terminated.
As the project was only for 40 days I finished it successfully and I my employer couldnt find me another job till now. So I decided to work on my own when I got an opportunity with the previously worked vendor, when my employer came to know about this he has threatened me to sue me. Then I retrieved from the opportunity but now even my employer doesnt pay me anything. It is been 4 months, he hasn't paid me anything , even he hasnt provided me any insurance.
I asked my employer couple of times to terminate my agreement otherwise I would go to Department of Labor and claim my wages but he downplays that by saying I am not on H1B so I will not be paid unless I am working with Client. But the agreement didn't say anything like that.
I have even asked him to run the payroll where I worked .I.e in California but he ran it in New Jersey. When I pointed this to him he said the payroll will be run at the residing state if the employee works more than 6 months.
We had an argument about this but he never replies to my emails he only calls me and says whatever he wants to say but when I ask him to put whatever he has said to me on phone in an email he doesnt reply at all.
And to mention, he doesnt have any documents of mine. I even didnt fill any I9 form, what ever he has is the only agreement that I signed and social security number that I emailed him to run my pay roll.
After the argument I even requested him to send my original agreement signed by two parties. I only had the agreement signed by me, he even didnt send me the agreement with his sign on it even after repeated requests.
Now he doesnt even care to answer my calls or emails. I am really tensed. I am getting opportunities from vendor that I worked with but I am afraid he would sue me. Please help me What to do. I am really really frustrated, tensed and I can't express how I feel right now.
I want to get out of the contract and work with the vendor if Possible.
Please explain me how can I tackle this problem?
I would be really very very thankful to you.
Thanks,
Uday
1. You have two hands and two middle finger...just show to him and move on.
2. Or call the DOL and inform all...and he will be in soup.
Put everything in e mail or certified mail and pass all those information to DOL and move on.
You dont have to bother anything else.
Hi I am a student in United States and I was on Optional Practical Training from Jan 2008 to Dec 2008. As I finished my OPT in Dec 2008 I joined again in New course for M.S in soft. Eng.
In the month of November I got a job in California through an employer, who is based in New Jersey. As I got a job the employer asked me to sign a contract which states that I will be paid 60,000 per year and I shouldn't work with his clients for 1 year after the agreement is terminated.
As the project was only for 40 days I finished it successfully and I my employer couldnt find me another job till now. So I decided to work on my own when I got an opportunity with the previously worked vendor, when my employer came to know about this he has threatened me to sue me. Then I retrieved from the opportunity but now even my employer doesnt pay me anything. It is been 4 months, he hasn't paid me anything , even he hasnt provided me any insurance.
I asked my employer couple of times to terminate my agreement otherwise I would go to Department of Labor and claim my wages but he downplays that by saying I am not on H1B so I will not be paid unless I am working with Client. But the agreement didn't say anything like that.
I have even asked him to run the payroll where I worked .I.e in California but he ran it in New Jersey. When I pointed this to him he said the payroll will be run at the residing state if the employee works more than 6 months.
We had an argument about this but he never replies to my emails he only calls me and says whatever he wants to say but when I ask him to put whatever he has said to me on phone in an email he doesnt reply at all.
And to mention, he doesnt have any documents of mine. I even didnt fill any I9 form, what ever he has is the only agreement that I signed and social security number that I emailed him to run my pay roll.
After the argument I even requested him to send my original agreement signed by two parties. I only had the agreement signed by me, he even didnt send me the agreement with his sign on it even after repeated requests.
Now he doesnt even care to answer my calls or emails. I am really tensed. I am getting opportunities from vendor that I worked with but I am afraid he would sue me. Please help me What to do. I am really really frustrated, tensed and I can't express how I feel right now.
I want to get out of the contract and work with the vendor if Possible.
Please explain me how can I tackle this problem?
I would be really very very thankful to you.
Thanks,
Uday
1. You have two hands and two middle finger...just show to him and move on.
2. Or call the DOL and inform all...and he will be in soup.
Put everything in e mail or certified mail and pass all those information to DOL and move on.
You dont have to bother anything else.
hot Guitar Chord Chart 2
abracadabra102
08-14 10:16 AM
paskal,
you are telling me someone thought of this before me.. dang.. people are fast.. but i guess its hard to know because i don't really read all the forum topics.. too many. i think i will there at the dc rally. logistics in order. i m excited .. yay!
texcan,
allow me to indulge you with this rhyme
member -> 50 posts
senior member -> 100 posts
administrator -> 5 gazillion posts
one small card green in color -> PRICELESS
peace of mind is something forum post can never bring.. for that you need green card !
Well, I heard that THE CARD is not green anymore:D
you are telling me someone thought of this before me.. dang.. people are fast.. but i guess its hard to know because i don't really read all the forum topics.. too many. i think i will there at the dc rally. logistics in order. i m excited .. yay!
texcan,
allow me to indulge you with this rhyme
member -> 50 posts
senior member -> 100 posts
administrator -> 5 gazillion posts
one small card green in color -> PRICELESS
peace of mind is something forum post can never bring.. for that you need green card !
Well, I heard that THE CARD is not green anymore:D
more...
house Blues guitar chords
eb3retro
09-22 11:31 AM
real problem is we are trying to wake up someone who is pretending to sleep and we can never achieve that. I am starting to feel pessimistic too about this whole bill thing, when they debated for the freakin horse shit for so long where as genuine issues like ours getting delayed..excuse my language, i am just so frustrated and starting to feel there is no light at the end for legal immigrants.
tattoo basic guitar chords
snarla
06-25 02:31 PM
Thanks for your replies guys ...
So Pending AOS status is a legal status right?
Also once a person goes to Pending AOS status, can he/she come back to H1B again?
So Pending AOS status is a legal status right?
Also once a person goes to Pending AOS status, can he/she come back to H1B again?
more...
pictures Guitar Chord Chart
pitha
08-14 01:58 PM
I like your optimistic attitude but unfortunately I don�t share it because of past and current behavior of USCIS, like for instance how they willfully disregarded the 180 day name check memo. Do you really believe them when they say name check will be cleared in 2009, just like the current name check memo the fbi name check clearance will be thrown in a dustbin. If by a miracle name check is solved they will come up with some other check delay for example IBIS name check delay. the bottom line is if there is a will there will be a way, USCIS has no will what so ever to help us. Good luck to everyone but just build a reservoir of patience because if you have hope on USCIS you will pay dearly.
USCIS is trying to make EB2 all countries Current sometime during FY 2009. Of course "a few" 2004, 2005 cases will still be pending past Oct08 but hopefully not too many.
If EB1 and EB2 are shown as current soon, then the DOS can transfer the so-called "spillover" into EB3 ROW, then into EB3 IN & CH.
Based on available numbers, EB3 India / China will see rapid movement in dates April 09 Visa Bulletin onwards.
What will happen during 2009 in all likely hood is the following,
Almost all EB1 spillover will go to EB3. (~ 25k)
Some of EB1 and all of EB2 spillover will go to EB2 IN/CH (~ 10k to 15k)
In 2009, there will be no more Name Check delays - therefore expect rapid EB3 approvals after April 09.
USCIS is trying to make EB2 all countries Current sometime during FY 2009. Of course "a few" 2004, 2005 cases will still be pending past Oct08 but hopefully not too many.
If EB1 and EB2 are shown as current soon, then the DOS can transfer the so-called "spillover" into EB3 ROW, then into EB3 IN & CH.
Based on available numbers, EB3 India / China will see rapid movement in dates April 09 Visa Bulletin onwards.
What will happen during 2009 in all likely hood is the following,
Almost all EB1 spillover will go to EB3. (~ 25k)
Some of EB1 and all of EB2 spillover will go to EB2 IN/CH (~ 10k to 15k)
In 2009, there will be no more Name Check delays - therefore expect rapid EB3 approvals after April 09.
dresses guitar. Playing chords is
youngindia
06-23 08:37 AM
This minister may be the right person to initiate a soc sec. treaty between India-US like there is one between US-Canada. May be, once the US politicians see money going out they will respond to our issues.
more...
makeup chords to your guitar
vin
06-14 08:53 PM
The agreement, coming after President Bush’s pledge earlier today to provide $4.4 billion for border security, revives a bill that had stalled in the Senate and was all but given up for dead.
Seeing the quote from the link provided, I feel all the ripped off $$$ from us will be used in enforcing border security..:-) They must've pondered "where will all the money come from??, and then someone must've come up with the idea, hey clear the GC backlogs of the past 5 years and make the dates current tomorrow!"
Seeing the quote from the link provided, I feel all the ripped off $$$ from us will be used in enforcing border security..:-) They must've pondered "where will all the money come from??, and then someone must've come up with the idea, hey clear the GC backlogs of the past 5 years and make the dates current tomorrow!"
girlfriend blues chords for lefties
satishku_2000
06-14 06:13 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19221467/
WASHINGTON - Key senators tentatively agreed on a plan to revive a stalled immigration bill on Thursday, aided by President Bush's support for a quick $4.4 billion aimed at "securing our borders and enforcing our laws at the work site."
Officials who spoke on condition of anonymity said Republican and Democratic supporters of the bill were presenting their proposal to the Senate's top two leaders, who in turn arranged an early evening meeting to discuss it.
Precise details to be presented to Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., were not disclosed.
In general, according to officials familiar with the discussions, Republicans and Democrats would each be accorded roughly a dozen chances to amend the measure, with the hope that they would then combine to provide the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster by die-hard opponents. The officials who described the emerging plan did so on condition of anonymity, saying the negotiations had been conducted in private.
The legislation has generated intense controversy, particularly for provisions envisioning eventual citizenship for many of the estimated 12 million immigrants now in the country unlawfully. The bill also calls for greater border security and a crackdown on the hiring of illegal employees.
In general, according to officials familiar with the discussions, Republicans and Democrats would each be accorded roughly a dozen chances to amend the measure, with the hope that they would then combine to provide the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster by die-hard opponents. The officials who described the emerging plan did so on condition of anonymity, saying the negotiations had been conducted in private.
The legislation has generated intense controversy, particularly for provisions envisioning eventual citizenship for many of the estimated 12 million immigrants now in the country unlawfully. The bill also calls for greater border security and a crackdown on the hiring of illegal employees.
"We're going to show the American people that the promises in this bill will be kept," Bush said, two days after launching a personal rescue mission.
Bush supports setting aside all the fees and penalties in the bill solely for tougher security on the border and workplace enforcement, White House press secretary Tony Snow said earlier Thursday. The president on Monday morning will make the announcement of his backing for an amendment that two Republican senators have proposed to accomplish this end.
The provision would immediately divert $4.4 billion toward border security, with that amount to be paid back once the new fees are in place, Snow said.
With many questions unanswered, it was unclear how much of a concession the move amounts to for Bush.
The White House did not have an estimate of how much money the provision would generate yearly toward border security. It also could not say whether the money would be in addition to currently planned border security funding levels or just a way to dedicate funds to that purpose. And it wasn't clear what budget account would be drawn down to pay for the initial $4.4 billion.
The aim, Snow said, is "trying to get money to the border right away."
2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
WASHINGTON - Key senators tentatively agreed on a plan to revive a stalled immigration bill on Thursday, aided by President Bush's support for a quick $4.4 billion aimed at "securing our borders and enforcing our laws at the work site."
Officials who spoke on condition of anonymity said Republican and Democratic supporters of the bill were presenting their proposal to the Senate's top two leaders, who in turn arranged an early evening meeting to discuss it.
Precise details to be presented to Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., were not disclosed.
In general, according to officials familiar with the discussions, Republicans and Democrats would each be accorded roughly a dozen chances to amend the measure, with the hope that they would then combine to provide the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster by die-hard opponents. The officials who described the emerging plan did so on condition of anonymity, saying the negotiations had been conducted in private.
The legislation has generated intense controversy, particularly for provisions envisioning eventual citizenship for many of the estimated 12 million immigrants now in the country unlawfully. The bill also calls for greater border security and a crackdown on the hiring of illegal employees.
In general, according to officials familiar with the discussions, Republicans and Democrats would each be accorded roughly a dozen chances to amend the measure, with the hope that they would then combine to provide the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster by die-hard opponents. The officials who described the emerging plan did so on condition of anonymity, saying the negotiations had been conducted in private.
The legislation has generated intense controversy, particularly for provisions envisioning eventual citizenship for many of the estimated 12 million immigrants now in the country unlawfully. The bill also calls for greater border security and a crackdown on the hiring of illegal employees.
"We're going to show the American people that the promises in this bill will be kept," Bush said, two days after launching a personal rescue mission.
Bush supports setting aside all the fees and penalties in the bill solely for tougher security on the border and workplace enforcement, White House press secretary Tony Snow said earlier Thursday. The president on Monday morning will make the announcement of his backing for an amendment that two Republican senators have proposed to accomplish this end.
The provision would immediately divert $4.4 billion toward border security, with that amount to be paid back once the new fees are in place, Snow said.
With many questions unanswered, it was unclear how much of a concession the move amounts to for Bush.
The White House did not have an estimate of how much money the provision would generate yearly toward border security. It also could not say whether the money would be in addition to currently planned border security funding levels or just a way to dedicate funds to that purpose. And it wasn't clear what budget account would be drawn down to pay for the initial $4.4 billion.
The aim, Snow said, is "trying to get money to the border right away."
2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
hairstyles chords on guitar.
kushaljn
07-24 03:17 PM
In Skokie.
ivuser
02-16 04:40 PM
CMCN
Page URL : http://www.cmcn.ab.ca/gettinggreencard.php
Content :
Job switch after getting Green Card!?
Question:
My question is: Can a person switch the job once (s)he gets his Immigration Stamp? If not then what is the period of time for changing the job after immigration stamp. Note that he is currently on H1B and waiting for Immigration Interview.
Answer:
The official rule (which IMHO has not changed with the passage of AC21) is that you must not have any preconceived intention to leave the job when you get your Green Card. (Your friend clearly does :-( ) In general, working for the company for one year after getting the GC is normally considered sufficient.
If he can't stand the thought of a whole other year at the company, then he should withdraw his consular processing and switch to adjustment of status within the US. 180 days after his AOS is filed, he can take advantage of AC21 and switch jobs, providing he remains in the same field. Of course, the downside is that it'll be an extra year or more before he actually gets his GC.
I doubt such a "rule" would be enforceable after AC21 for people getting greencard thru the lengthy I-485 process. It makes no sense that someone in the I-485 for more than 180 can change job while still getting the greencard, while someone with the greencard can't change jobs after waiting for so long on the I-485. A federal judge would certainly dismiss such case.
I wouldn't speak so soon. We already have an analogous situation with marriage: if you divorce three years and six months into a marriage, do you get to keep your Green Card? Not if the processing took between 18 months and two years. If it was more than two years, you are home and dry because you got a full GC; but if you get your GC even one day before your second wedding anniversary, it's conditional on you staying married for another full two years (with a few exceptions for domestic violence etc.)
So although I agree the situation is iniquitous, we already have a close analogue enshrined and clear in law. Could it survive a challenge under the 14th Amendment? Maybe not, but nobody (to my knowledge) has ever tried.
Page URL : http://www.cmcn.ab.ca/gettinggreencard.php
Content :
Job switch after getting Green Card!?
Question:
My question is: Can a person switch the job once (s)he gets his Immigration Stamp? If not then what is the period of time for changing the job after immigration stamp. Note that he is currently on H1B and waiting for Immigration Interview.
Answer:
The official rule (which IMHO has not changed with the passage of AC21) is that you must not have any preconceived intention to leave the job when you get your Green Card. (Your friend clearly does :-( ) In general, working for the company for one year after getting the GC is normally considered sufficient.
If he can't stand the thought of a whole other year at the company, then he should withdraw his consular processing and switch to adjustment of status within the US. 180 days after his AOS is filed, he can take advantage of AC21 and switch jobs, providing he remains in the same field. Of course, the downside is that it'll be an extra year or more before he actually gets his GC.
I doubt such a "rule" would be enforceable after AC21 for people getting greencard thru the lengthy I-485 process. It makes no sense that someone in the I-485 for more than 180 can change job while still getting the greencard, while someone with the greencard can't change jobs after waiting for so long on the I-485. A federal judge would certainly dismiss such case.
I wouldn't speak so soon. We already have an analogous situation with marriage: if you divorce three years and six months into a marriage, do you get to keep your Green Card? Not if the processing took between 18 months and two years. If it was more than two years, you are home and dry because you got a full GC; but if you get your GC even one day before your second wedding anniversary, it's conditional on you staying married for another full two years (with a few exceptions for domestic violence etc.)
So although I agree the situation is iniquitous, we already have a close analogue enshrined and clear in law. Could it survive a challenge under the 14th Amendment? Maybe not, but nobody (to my knowledge) has ever tried.
bbct
03-03 10:09 PM
I got a letter from IRS stating they have notified the employer to send the corrected W-2. I should be waiting two weeks before the due date and then use Form 4852 to report the correct wages. This has become a stress for no-fault of ours. If the employer provides us a corrected W-2 after we file our taxes and if the figures don't match then we should amend our taxes using 1040X. I am sure the employer will wait till the last date or near to due date to give us a corrected W-2. This is a real pain in the a$$.
No comments:
Post a Comment