gk_2000
05-05 10:13 AM
Even though the context of your question and intention is suspicious at best....it's actually a really good question.
Let me restate it for the benefit of others
BB: Mind pointing out what exactly is suspicious about me or my question?
And Grrrrr why only for the benefit of "others"? And I thot we were "friends"..
Let me restate it for the benefit of others
BB: Mind pointing out what exactly is suspicious about me or my question?
And Grrrrr why only for the benefit of "others"? And I thot we were "friends"..
wallpaper Clair Bidez i Hannah Teter
p_kumar
09-21 04:40 PM
does it mean i will get my EAD processed as per my RD which will be much earlier?. :D
thanks for you response.
thanks for you response.
suresh.emails
08-14 01:24 PM
Count me in to any IV campaigns.
I already have Green Card (GC) in hand. I would like to support IV for all good causes.
EB2-I Dec -2005 PD. GC APPROVED DATE : 08/06/2008
I already have Green Card (GC) in hand. I would like to support IV for all good causes.
EB2-I Dec -2005 PD. GC APPROVED DATE : 08/06/2008
2011 Clair Bidez (sa ski boards).
nojoke
10-14 07:44 PM
I agree with sri1309. This would stop the bleeding of the economic crisis. Folks just wont stop by buying house alone, they all will be motivated to spend more money. guys, our folks most of them are well positioned with good paying jobs and pay and the only reason for not spending and not buy houses are because of the insecurity of the stay due to the h1b extension.
We all to some extent know that this whole mess is due to the deregulation of the financial institiution and because of which high supply of houses ( SUPPLY and DEMAND. Now with the bailout government owns all these houses). By passing some legislation can control the deregulation but how do you sell the government owned houses quickly to the people? who will buy? Immigration is the best option. Here is my recommendation, regulate and tightenend the loans for the house constructing companies to control the supply side from the constructing compnay and issue green cards to all the legal immigrants to increase the demand side of the equation. Additionally bringing the ?? milliion illegal immigrants to legal will increase the tax revenue of the government. My 2cents says that whoever the next president, the comprehensive immigration reforms would be the best solutions for solving the current economic mess.
There are a lot of US citizens wanting to buy house. The problem is they are not able to afford and sitting on the sidelines. The house values will drop to affordable levels for regular folks to buy. Nothing will stop it. Even if all immigrants buy today, you can only postpone the crash. The basic problem is affordability. You can reduce the supply, but who will be able to pay inflated house prices?
We all to some extent know that this whole mess is due to the deregulation of the financial institiution and because of which high supply of houses ( SUPPLY and DEMAND. Now with the bailout government owns all these houses). By passing some legislation can control the deregulation but how do you sell the government owned houses quickly to the people? who will buy? Immigration is the best option. Here is my recommendation, regulate and tightenend the loans for the house constructing companies to control the supply side from the constructing compnay and issue green cards to all the legal immigrants to increase the demand side of the equation. Additionally bringing the ?? milliion illegal immigrants to legal will increase the tax revenue of the government. My 2cents says that whoever the next president, the comprehensive immigration reforms would be the best solutions for solving the current economic mess.
There are a lot of US citizens wanting to buy house. The problem is they are not able to afford and sitting on the sidelines. The house values will drop to affordable levels for regular folks to buy. Nothing will stop it. Even if all immigrants buy today, you can only postpone the crash. The basic problem is affordability. You can reduce the supply, but who will be able to pay inflated house prices?
more...
ebizash
02-10 02:03 PM
And one obvious and major difference is hassle going out of the country and getting back in.
irha
12-07 01:33 PM
@saketkapur, thanks for the clarification. Interesting to know that they don't do it consistenly.
more...
Hewa
05-06 07:14 PM
I had no problem in getting the in-state rate in Florida.
They just wanted to see my H1B approval notice.
They just wanted to see my H1B approval notice.
2010 Danh sách của tạp chí Sports
ho_gaya_kaya_?
05-23 09:40 AM
What about if one comes back on AP and hence has to use EAD but also has a valid H1 approval ( but no stamping in the passport ) . Can they go back and use that H1 approval for stamping and come back on H1 ? They are still working for the same company which sponsered the H1 and the GC
if you use AP- you dont have to use EAD- you can continue to use H1
and get it stamped the next time you go to consulate.
if you use AP- you dont have to use EAD- you can continue to use H1
and get it stamped the next time you go to consulate.
more...
pd_recapturing
03-16 01:28 PM
http://imminfo.com/Newsletter/2009-3/2009-03.html
Please ignore if previously posted.
Please ignore if previously posted.
hair Sports Illustrated SwimSuit
Sakthisagar
11-15 10:11 AM
Immigration and education should be two seperate things. NO support to categorize further on immigration, We should take out the country cap. It should be First come first serve basis. with necessary background checks on education and skills.
more...
apatel_17
07-11 02:31 PM
No is the correct answer.. they are here as visitors (not residents - US tax returns are for US residents - tax return 101)
also they don't have SS# i presume, so how can you even think about adding them as dependents?
Good try though :)
IRS does not use the same terminology as USCIS. If you are working in the US on an H1B visa, you are a "US Resident Alien" according to IRS. Those who pass a "substantial presence" test in the US can be claimed as dependents if they do not have significant income in another country, and are not claimed as dependents by anyone else. IRS will take your tax dollars whether you have a SSN or not ;-) That's why they issue Individual Tax Identification Numbers. Dependent visa holders use the ITIN to uniquely identify themselves in tax filings.
also they don't have SS# i presume, so how can you even think about adding them as dependents?
Good try though :)
IRS does not use the same terminology as USCIS. If you are working in the US on an H1B visa, you are a "US Resident Alien" according to IRS. Those who pass a "substantial presence" test in the US can be claimed as dependents if they do not have significant income in another country, and are not claimed as dependents by anyone else. IRS will take your tax dollars whether you have a SSN or not ;-) That's why they issue Individual Tax Identification Numbers. Dependent visa holders use the ITIN to uniquely identify themselves in tax filings.
hot Foto: Sports Illustrated/
thomachan72
08-17 01:06 PM
What does your attorney say? He/she should have had some idea when they filed under EB2. The attorney should clearly not take a risk regarding educational requirements. Maybe you will have to do the MTR and submit better evaulation (if you feel the degree and experience are suitable). Best
more...
house Sports Illustrated Swimsuit
sbind_77
08-31 02:41 PM
This is what I am seeing in my 485 status
Post Decision Activity
On August 6, 2010, we mailed you a notice that we have approved this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS. Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service at 1-800-375-5283.
I received the Approval notice on Aug 14th. Nothing after that. I never missed any mail from USCIS till now.
There no other status change between Initial Review and Post Decision Activity.
I have Infopass appt next week. Let me see if they have any info on this.
Post Decision Activity
On August 6, 2010, we mailed you a notice that we have approved this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS. Please follow any instructions on the notice. If you move before you receive the notice, call customer service at 1-800-375-5283.
I received the Approval notice on Aug 14th. Nothing after that. I never missed any mail from USCIS till now.
There no other status change between Initial Review and Post Decision Activity.
I have Infopass appt next week. Let me see if they have any info on this.
tattoo Sports Illustrated#39;ın 2010
kshitijnt
10-01 12:23 PM
I am sorry you made BA as a choice. Kindly do not support any airlines/countries that require visas for Indian citizens in transit.
more...
pictures Hannah Teter In Sports
arnet
08-29 01:11 PM
Can IV contact some of our members in and around Dallas area to attend this meeting? IV can help them to prepare the key points regd our retrogression problems/solutions and the urgency to implement this solution. so that, it will be easier for them to present it to the hearing committee.
Thanks.
Good find retropain.
It seems this is one of the last and only hearings that concerns high skiiled immigrants. Most of the hearings have been focussed on undocumented immigrants and border security.
Thanks.
Good find retropain.
It seems this is one of the last and only hearings that concerns high skiiled immigrants. Most of the hearings have been focussed on undocumented immigrants and border security.
dresses Clair Bidez (môn trượt tuyết
zCool
04-10 08:26 AM
There are 2 separate issues here..
1. Do you HAVE OR NOT a job with this middle vendor, from your description below seems like your prior employer waived Non-Compete part of your employment agreement to you and you just quit that position?
2. Technically you are still on the payroll of your employer?? He's sorta right, if you are on OPT, he's not legally bound to inform INS of the termination, and terminating employment does not negate the 12 mo. non-compete you signed on.
I agree with other commentors here, you should move on. In your case, moving on would need,
1. Make sure you got paid for actual time you were on the contract.
2. If you haven't already DO NOT QUIT THE JOB under threat of law-suit. In fact Non-Compete viability depends on state of employment. In CA it's impossible to enforce. Even if he sues, there better than 50/50 chance you will win due to "undue duress" clause that negates it.
3. Threaten him that you will go after him and his H1bs. Get a lawyer (spend 500$) and send him official letter. Since you are in CA and he's in NJ, even more troublesome for him is to attend small claims court dates.. go to local court and ask for jurisdiction there.. make sure to include name of OWNER in the law-suit,
Basiically don't be scared, don't get mad, get even..
Hello Everyone,
Hi I am a student in United States and I was on Optional Practical Training from Jan 2008
to Dec 2008. As I finished my OPT in Dec 2008 I joined again in New course for M.S in soft. Eng.
In the month of November I got a job in California through an employer, who is based in New Jersey. As I got a job the employer asked me to sign a contract which states that I will be paid 60,000 per year and I shouldn't work with his clients for 1 year after the agreement is terminated.
As the project was only for 40 days I finished it successfully and I my employer couldnt find me another job till now. So I decided to work on my own when I got an opportunity with the previously worked vendor, when my employer came to know about this he has threatened me to sue me. Then I retrieved from the opportunity but now even my employer doesnt pay me anything. It is been 4 months, he hasn't paid me anything , even he hasnt provided me any insurance.
I asked my employer couple of times to terminate my agreement otherwise I would go to Department of Labor and claim my wages but he downplays that by saying I am not on H1B so I will not be paid unless I am working with Client. But the agreement didn't say anything like that.
I have even asked him to run the payroll where I worked .I.e in California but he ran it in New Jersey. When I pointed this to him he said the payroll will be run at the residing state if the employee works more than 6 months.
We had an argument about this but he never replies to my emails he only calls me and says whatever he wants to say but when I ask him to put whatever he has said to me on phone in an email he doesnt reply at all.
And to mention, he doesnt have any documents of mine. I even didnt fill any I9 form, what ever he has is the only agreement that I signed and social security number that I emailed him to run my pay roll.
After the argument I even requested him to send my original agreement signed by two parties. I only had the agreement signed by me, he even didnt send me the agreement with his sign on it even after repeated requests.
Now he doesnt even care to answer my calls or emails. I am really tensed. I am getting opportunities from vendor that I worked with but I am afraid he would sue me. Please help me What to do. I am really really frustrated, tensed and I can't express how I feel right now.
I want to get out of the contract and work with the vendor if Possible.
Please explain me how can I tackle this problem?
I would be really very very thankful to you.
Thanks,
Uday
1. Do you HAVE OR NOT a job with this middle vendor, from your description below seems like your prior employer waived Non-Compete part of your employment agreement to you and you just quit that position?
2. Technically you are still on the payroll of your employer?? He's sorta right, if you are on OPT, he's not legally bound to inform INS of the termination, and terminating employment does not negate the 12 mo. non-compete you signed on.
I agree with other commentors here, you should move on. In your case, moving on would need,
1. Make sure you got paid for actual time you were on the contract.
2. If you haven't already DO NOT QUIT THE JOB under threat of law-suit. In fact Non-Compete viability depends on state of employment. In CA it's impossible to enforce. Even if he sues, there better than 50/50 chance you will win due to "undue duress" clause that negates it.
3. Threaten him that you will go after him and his H1bs. Get a lawyer (spend 500$) and send him official letter. Since you are in CA and he's in NJ, even more troublesome for him is to attend small claims court dates.. go to local court and ask for jurisdiction there.. make sure to include name of OWNER in the law-suit,
Basiically don't be scared, don't get mad, get even..
Hello Everyone,
Hi I am a student in United States and I was on Optional Practical Training from Jan 2008
to Dec 2008. As I finished my OPT in Dec 2008 I joined again in New course for M.S in soft. Eng.
In the month of November I got a job in California through an employer, who is based in New Jersey. As I got a job the employer asked me to sign a contract which states that I will be paid 60,000 per year and I shouldn't work with his clients for 1 year after the agreement is terminated.
As the project was only for 40 days I finished it successfully and I my employer couldnt find me another job till now. So I decided to work on my own when I got an opportunity with the previously worked vendor, when my employer came to know about this he has threatened me to sue me. Then I retrieved from the opportunity but now even my employer doesnt pay me anything. It is been 4 months, he hasn't paid me anything , even he hasnt provided me any insurance.
I asked my employer couple of times to terminate my agreement otherwise I would go to Department of Labor and claim my wages but he downplays that by saying I am not on H1B so I will not be paid unless I am working with Client. But the agreement didn't say anything like that.
I have even asked him to run the payroll where I worked .I.e in California but he ran it in New Jersey. When I pointed this to him he said the payroll will be run at the residing state if the employee works more than 6 months.
We had an argument about this but he never replies to my emails he only calls me and says whatever he wants to say but when I ask him to put whatever he has said to me on phone in an email he doesnt reply at all.
And to mention, he doesnt have any documents of mine. I even didnt fill any I9 form, what ever he has is the only agreement that I signed and social security number that I emailed him to run my pay roll.
After the argument I even requested him to send my original agreement signed by two parties. I only had the agreement signed by me, he even didnt send me the agreement with his sign on it even after repeated requests.
Now he doesnt even care to answer my calls or emails. I am really tensed. I am getting opportunities from vendor that I worked with but I am afraid he would sue me. Please help me What to do. I am really really frustrated, tensed and I can't express how I feel right now.
I want to get out of the contract and work with the vendor if Possible.
Please explain me how can I tackle this problem?
I would be really very very thankful to you.
Thanks,
Uday
more...
makeup british sports illustrated
apt29
06-04 10:30 AM
If company is promoting and Apply for EB2, then the PD should be Promotion Date. Because EB2 qualification starts only after promotion. One cannot go back and get old PD and attach it to EB2 after promotion. That is unfair to people, who are already promoted and applied before. Hope this makes sense.
Why are you jealous. Seems like he is qualified for EB-2 and applied it.
Buddy, I am in the same situation with an American company for which I am working since 2002. I applied in EB-3 (at that time per the job requirements). Company is ready to promote me but I am not accepting due to my EB-3. They decided to file labor for the future job which comes under EB-2. They filed it and waiting for approval.Once I get labor and 140, yes I will use EB-2 and take the promotion. How is this become an abuse, can you expalin? In my view if you get an offer for the future job in EB-2 category and not use that opportunity then that is called abusing yourself not the law.
What's wrong there other than making some people jealous.
Why are you jealous. Seems like he is qualified for EB-2 and applied it.
Buddy, I am in the same situation with an American company for which I am working since 2002. I applied in EB-3 (at that time per the job requirements). Company is ready to promote me but I am not accepting due to my EB-3. They decided to file labor for the future job which comes under EB-2. They filed it and waiting for approval.Once I get labor and 140, yes I will use EB-2 and take the promotion. How is this become an abuse, can you expalin? In my view if you get an offer for the future job in EB-2 category and not use that opportunity then that is called abusing yourself not the law.
What's wrong there other than making some people jealous.
girlfriend Clair Bidez, 23 lata (USA,
kumar_77
11-21 02:46 PM
Can Some one provide me with a draft about just EB problem which i can fax to the lawmakers
thanks
kumar
269 267 1337
Grand rapids
thanks
kumar
269 267 1337
Grand rapids
hairstyles Serena-williams-hot-in-sports-
immique
06-18 07:54 PM
Thanks all for the various responses. However, Immique, what kind of RFE can be expected @ 485 stage?
Also, I have moved to Biz Dev from an engineer after my Labor. I now have my 140 and EAD. Is there any risk because of my change in role?
I am just giving a general idea of what the process might be. many people get RFEs for no good reason. In this particular instance for example the work experience may be questioned and also the job duties and how much they are different (including difference in pay) to justify EB3 to EB2 conversion. many aspects that are generally overlooked will attract more scrutiny as the application becomes more complicated as they have to review both the applications in detail.
Moreover, lets say the number of EB2 applications every year is about half of the number of EB3 applications or lets assume the average number of EB2s every year in the last 5-6 years was abut 30,000 per year and unusually if this year the EB2 applications go up to 60,000 and 30,000 of them are actually EB3 to EB2 conversions, that in itself will trigger a red flag to USCIS and will lead to increased scrutiny of all those applications that may have been converted or are filed after the visa numbers became unavailable. My intention is not to discourage anyone moving from EB3 to EB2, but am just advising that you do it right and take the help of the lawyer, because by chance if you get an RFE, you do not want to be answering it yourself. let a professional lawyer handle it. if you are confident that you have a high likelihood of success then go for it, but don't listen to all those that say it is very easy. do your own assessment and decide for yourself. in the end it is your greencard application and not theirs. you always hope for the best outcome but remember you have to be well prepared for the worst possible outcome if it happens. what did life teach you so far?
Also, I have moved to Biz Dev from an engineer after my Labor. I now have my 140 and EAD. Is there any risk because of my change in role?
I am just giving a general idea of what the process might be. many people get RFEs for no good reason. In this particular instance for example the work experience may be questioned and also the job duties and how much they are different (including difference in pay) to justify EB3 to EB2 conversion. many aspects that are generally overlooked will attract more scrutiny as the application becomes more complicated as they have to review both the applications in detail.
Moreover, lets say the number of EB2 applications every year is about half of the number of EB3 applications or lets assume the average number of EB2s every year in the last 5-6 years was abut 30,000 per year and unusually if this year the EB2 applications go up to 60,000 and 30,000 of them are actually EB3 to EB2 conversions, that in itself will trigger a red flag to USCIS and will lead to increased scrutiny of all those applications that may have been converted or are filed after the visa numbers became unavailable. My intention is not to discourage anyone moving from EB3 to EB2, but am just advising that you do it right and take the help of the lawyer, because by chance if you get an RFE, you do not want to be answering it yourself. let a professional lawyer handle it. if you are confident that you have a high likelihood of success then go for it, but don't listen to all those that say it is very easy. do your own assessment and decide for yourself. in the end it is your greencard application and not theirs. you always hope for the best outcome but remember you have to be well prepared for the worst possible outcome if it happens. what did life teach you so far?
go_gc_way
05-27 11:22 AM
I see a lot of opposition for the bill from the news above and from others an optimism that bill might pass in Judiciary committe.
In Budget reconcilliation bill , it was thought , it was not a right place those amendments that would have relieved some of Retrogression be discussed.
I am wondering how will our issues (amendments that will relieve retrogression) be treated or happen what to them , when the passed bill will be discussed.
What do you guys think on Forum :)
In Budget reconcilliation bill , it was thought , it was not a right place those amendments that would have relieved some of Retrogression be discussed.
I am wondering how will our issues (amendments that will relieve retrogression) be treated or happen what to them , when the passed bill will be discussed.
What do you guys think on Forum :)
legalVoice
02-08 09:49 AM
It typically comes after 12 of every month.
No comments:
Post a Comment